🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.