🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the right medical coverage for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

According to recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $17,000 per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes over subsidies which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals receive payment would change. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income must contribute about five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what the typical American pays. I can name dozens of businesses that are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, those payments include retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When you add these expenses compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. Similar to many federal defense, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would make administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complicated (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with major insurers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding of coverage among workers – as opposed to the current system which require them to interpret the complications of current options. And there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' health histories for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, including national security to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It enables employees to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable strategy both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this current situation could be that we take serious examination in the mirror and agree that major reforms need to happen.